🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold policy to ban social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples around the globe. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and families are watching intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

European Trend

In Europe, a growing chorus of nations are considering similar measures.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the PM declaring that phones and platforms are "robbing our youngsters' youth". A law is expected to be formalized in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to implement a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• The Irish government is working on a digital wallet to verify the identity and age of social media account holders. The media minister have stated that an Australia-style ban could be "an tools on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the president has urged the legislature to pass a proposal raising the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has recommended a related move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The government in The Dutch government has advised parents to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a non-binding motion demanding a ban for minors unless guardian approval is granted. Even though it highlights of the "compulsive" nature of these services, the move does not create mandatory rules.

"A clear age barrier is a good starting point," said one parliamentarian behind the measure.

Britain: A Watchful Eye

In the UK, the government has not ruled out a future ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but stressing any decision must be "based on robust evidence".

Last year, support built behind a legislative effort to enact limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately weakened. Instead, the administration vowed to investigate the topic.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. An organization established by the loved ones of a teenager who died after encountering disturbing social media material contends that a blanket age ban may not improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when users reach the legal age.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are secure and fit for young users," said a influential child protection advocate.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, regulation is primarily occurring at the regional government level due to federal gridlock.

• Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a measure barring those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a regulation capping teenagers to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with extra use dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise passed bills requiring guardian approval for minors to open social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and suggestions from various individuals to copy Australia's example, a nationwide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Perspectives

Beyond these regions, other states are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

However, global agencies strike a more measured stance. Unicef has warned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even backfire". The body highlights that the internet can be a "vital connection" for marginalized youth and that government action should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to invest in user protection.

Even as this worldwide discussion continues, the actions of this nation and others show that governments globally are no longer prepared to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.